Why do we need risk management and quality improvement efforts in healthcare facilities? A simple comparison of "risk" and "quality" can highlight this topic.
"Risk" indicates something bad: a fall, a slip or an accident. These are all threats, threats or threats. Instead of "risk", these "bad" events include "fall management", "accident management" or "danger management". Scary things have to be handled so that it does not happen again.
The quality is good. This means excellence, superiority, the best. Long-term residents or patients in the hospital want "quality of life", "quality care", "quality food" and "quality service". The term "quality" means restoring "quality of life", "improving care" or "service improvement". Good things can be better, so fix them!
Even more interesting is the term "risk management" and "quality improvement". "Risk Improvement" is an oxymoron. Who would improve a threat or threat? While quality management signatures maintain quality in the status quo: good enough, we just handle it. Simplify the conditions, handle risk management, so it does not happen again; we improve the quality by improving the quality.
In healthcare, risk management focuses on threats or harmful situations through identification, analysis, reduction and prevention. Quality Improvement focuses on performance and performance-enhancing performance standards that are always reviewed and developed. Both are essential in every health situation. Both programs work together to provide a safe environment and high quality patient care.
Similarities and differences in risk management and quality improvement play an important role in maintaining a clean, safe, and healthy facility. Both have different goals, scope and approaches, but look similar to each other in complex healthcare, risk management and quality improvement. As each of them shares a common agenda for preventing adverse events, the combined efforts of both are patient safety and satisfaction, patient injury prevention, cost-effective use of resources and integrated administration and clinical activities.
By integrating quality improvement and risk management, everyone in the facility – from administrators to doctors, employees, and family members – works together to improve the quality of care and avoid disputes over threats to the facility's surroundings. Risks such as improper falls, malnutrition and dehydration, adverse side effects, pressure ulcers, migration and elopement, inadequate documentation or treatment failure, and excessive use / misuse of psychotropic drugs are inevitable even in the best under conditions. Such problems are often complicated by underemployment, poor quality of care, and accurate or incomplete transfer of information to the acute care environment.
To address such issues, such as staff, care, and communication, the facility needs to develop a culture that constantly improves staffing and continuously improves care, operations, and quality of care. Employees must also comply with appropriate reporting and feedback processes, as well as specific guidelines on emergency management and event investigations. Essentially, every member of the facility must devote a safe and healthy environment to patients or residents.
Simply managing risks and improving quality work hand in hand provides patients and health care facilities the safest, cleanest, and most enjoyable environment. Both risk management and quality improvement are equally important aspirations, both of which must be a priority list of all health care institutions. Locating these programs locally demonstrates to patients, residents, their families, staff members and the community that the organization is committed to its missions and values. So when and when an event occurs, the organization can best handle the best practices of both risk management and quality improvement.
Source by sbobet