Instead of trying to reach a great idea (what everyone does), it should be able to either break it into manageable pieces, or * build up the momentum in doing smaller jobs.
This is especially true of the "technology" industry; large companies such as Microsoft and Oracle have been consulted – a model that has allowed novices to earn money while learning.
This may seem simple, but in fact it is relatively unheard of. This is because this is not "sexy" … people prefer "pitch" to $ 500k before building a reputable cashflow in the interim. I was in both positions, so I know exactly which way of thinking leads.
The point is, if you are able to take a "slower" path, you will usually get the opportunity to do your ideas at your own time. In addition to the benefits of learning / perfecting craftsmen (while getting paid), there is not only the added strain / tension that typically comes from a business-funded launch.
The only disadvantage of course is time. It takes a lot of time to create any business activity, not to mention that it uses "big steps" for stairs. To this end, if you follow this path, you have to estimate the general model (rather than just look at it).
The way you have an "idea" to do is, first you need an audience who is interested in the idea. This is the most important issue for most designers and entrepreneurs – they tend to stay in the idea and forget that people really need to know it. Work on a "counseling" / "service" level before trying to implement the idea.
We've found that if you can build at least $ 10,000 before embarking on an idea, it's really a long way to go for a lot of progress. In addition, before we could do some parts of the final product while doing the work of others. I'm sure this is part of Oracle originally made.
For this purpose, you should never describe the long jumble behind the scenes. It not only fits better with the business environment, but also ensures that you get the most out of your business. "
Source by sbobet